Citizen Reporter Cameron Macdonald is working on a story about the Wednesday morning, Aug. 20, pit bull rampage and subsequent shooting to death of one of the dogs.
According to preliminary police reports from the Elk Grove Police Department, the large dogs menaced some people, attacked someone's pet, and then approached police - one officer shot and killed one of the dogs. The other canine was later caught.
Police spokesperson Christopher Trim said the owner of the dogs was cited, but refused to release the owner's name.
Thursday evening, Macdonald, acting in his reporting/journalistic duties and at request of Editor Jeff Forward and on behalf of the Elk Grove Citizen, submitted a California public records request to City Clerk Susan Blackston in an attempt to obtain the name of the owner or person responsible for the two dogs.
On Friday, City Attorney Susan Cochran informed Editor Jeff Forward that the city would not be releasing the name of the owner of the two pit bulls.
Cochran also said that the information was not required to be disclosed to the press or public citizens under her reading and interpretation of the the California Public Records Act, section 6254 (f). Cochran said an official city letter would be sent to the Citizen offices next week informing of the non-disclosure.
The Citizen news team is following up on this story next week and will have updates in print editions, online at egcitizen.com.
Jeff Forward
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Quick Opinion -Does Elk Grove have one more gold rush in it?
Opinion By Jeff Forward
Citizen Editor
As plans for the city of Elk Grove’s sphere of influence expansion bid move forward, things are also staying busy on another aspect of the area’s future: the El Dorado –Interstate-5 connector highway.
Tuesday night, Aug. 19, dozens of area residents, city leaders, and many candidates for upcoming local elections listened to Tom Zlotkowski – the executive director of the JPA handling the connector plans - talk about the proposed connector highway.
This highway – which could have more than 30 red light intersections - would likely run through the middle of Sheldon and down across the south area of the city and on to I-5 at the Hood Franklin exit.
The folks in Sheldon are not happy, and have proposed an alternative route for the connector through farmland to the south. Now, the farmers, ranchers, and residents of Wilton are frustrated by another foray into their cherished rural residential community.
The new concerns only compound Wilton resident’s fears of development fueled by the city’s expansion plans, which currently stop at the Cosumnes River.
But, one must brush aside momentarily all the controversy over the connector highway and Elk Grove expansion plans to see the real big picture.
It’s a familiar tune, one Elk Grove has seen before – lots of land; land ripe for development of all sorts.
It’s another gold rush.
We can all remember the last gold rush in Elk Grove. Homes were being built faster than they could sell; the housing market was at its peak; and the city coffers were filled with enough money to give officials huge raises in salaries and benefits.
Now, as we muddle through some economic hard times, city leaders have seen another gold rush in the not-so-distant future.
As plans for the city’s expansion bid and connector highway plod along, I imagine some astute planner, elected official, or city administrator has looked at the really big picture: money.
Yes, these city expansion and connector plans – if they develop as currently envisioned -would allow the city of Elk Grove to add an extremely lucrative, lesser-developed corridor of land to the city’s boundaries.
Imagine; there could possibly be 30 red light intersections on the connector – with the accompanying businesses (gas stations, fast food eateries, hotels) and mini-malls, which would undoubtedly sprout up around them.
Adding to that potential commercial development (and tax revenue) is the open land that would run southeast from Grant Line Road into the flood plains of the Cosumnes River and across vast swaths of prime agriculture and ranching land.
City leaders and planning officials say there are no plans for development in the flood plain, but local residents have heard that before.
One only needs to look back at the city’s record of eminent domain lawsuits as well as their rezoning of various parcels of land to fit the needs of what once-was America’s fastest growing city.
This is a situation that’s been played out in communities across the state and nation. City leaders want to be seen as visionaries, and for their part, those in Elk Grove have seen a vision.
That vision – based on their actions and plans for the southeast section of Sacramento County – is not one of making the city a better place to live.
No, it’s designed to max out the financial potential of the city of Elk Grove by gobbling up what is left of a respected, rural community – which, for anyone who cares, has its own sense of vibrancy and relevance and environmental uniqueness.
Of course, none of these plans are set in stone, and they may fall flat as the future unfolds. All the projects are currently facing difficulties ranging from pesky citizen activists to the all-important question of how these things will be financed.
In the end, meetings like the one Tuesday night will determine how the city’s future unfolds. The fact that it was so well attended by people of all levels in the community was promising and welcome.
If there is one thing citizens of every community can do, it is to flex their power as a unified body to foster awareness and change at the local level.
One has to be involved to do that, and anyone who has a vested interest in the future of this community – and the ones to the southeast of it – needs to stay informed and be active in the planning.
We’ve all seen the downside of rampant, unchecked growth in our community. Now, the future really is in the hands of the citizens. If citizens don’t want to see a repeat of the past, then they need to get involved.
Tuesday was a good beginning.
Citizen Editor
As plans for the city of Elk Grove’s sphere of influence expansion bid move forward, things are also staying busy on another aspect of the area’s future: the El Dorado –Interstate-5 connector highway.
Tuesday night, Aug. 19, dozens of area residents, city leaders, and many candidates for upcoming local elections listened to Tom Zlotkowski – the executive director of the JPA handling the connector plans - talk about the proposed connector highway.
This highway – which could have more than 30 red light intersections - would likely run through the middle of Sheldon and down across the south area of the city and on to I-5 at the Hood Franklin exit.
The folks in Sheldon are not happy, and have proposed an alternative route for the connector through farmland to the south. Now, the farmers, ranchers, and residents of Wilton are frustrated by another foray into their cherished rural residential community.
The new concerns only compound Wilton resident’s fears of development fueled by the city’s expansion plans, which currently stop at the Cosumnes River.
But, one must brush aside momentarily all the controversy over the connector highway and Elk Grove expansion plans to see the real big picture.
It’s a familiar tune, one Elk Grove has seen before – lots of land; land ripe for development of all sorts.
It’s another gold rush.
We can all remember the last gold rush in Elk Grove. Homes were being built faster than they could sell; the housing market was at its peak; and the city coffers were filled with enough money to give officials huge raises in salaries and benefits.
Now, as we muddle through some economic hard times, city leaders have seen another gold rush in the not-so-distant future.
As plans for the city’s expansion bid and connector highway plod along, I imagine some astute planner, elected official, or city administrator has looked at the really big picture: money.
Yes, these city expansion and connector plans – if they develop as currently envisioned -would allow the city of Elk Grove to add an extremely lucrative, lesser-developed corridor of land to the city’s boundaries.
Imagine; there could possibly be 30 red light intersections on the connector – with the accompanying businesses (gas stations, fast food eateries, hotels) and mini-malls, which would undoubtedly sprout up around them.
Adding to that potential commercial development (and tax revenue) is the open land that would run southeast from Grant Line Road into the flood plains of the Cosumnes River and across vast swaths of prime agriculture and ranching land.
City leaders and planning officials say there are no plans for development in the flood plain, but local residents have heard that before.
One only needs to look back at the city’s record of eminent domain lawsuits as well as their rezoning of various parcels of land to fit the needs of what once-was America’s fastest growing city.
This is a situation that’s been played out in communities across the state and nation. City leaders want to be seen as visionaries, and for their part, those in Elk Grove have seen a vision.
That vision – based on their actions and plans for the southeast section of Sacramento County – is not one of making the city a better place to live.
No, it’s designed to max out the financial potential of the city of Elk Grove by gobbling up what is left of a respected, rural community – which, for anyone who cares, has its own sense of vibrancy and relevance and environmental uniqueness.
Of course, none of these plans are set in stone, and they may fall flat as the future unfolds. All the projects are currently facing difficulties ranging from pesky citizen activists to the all-important question of how these things will be financed.
In the end, meetings like the one Tuesday night will determine how the city’s future unfolds. The fact that it was so well attended by people of all levels in the community was promising and welcome.
If there is one thing citizens of every community can do, it is to flex their power as a unified body to foster awareness and change at the local level.
One has to be involved to do that, and anyone who has a vested interest in the future of this community – and the ones to the southeast of it – needs to stay informed and be active in the planning.
We’ve all seen the downside of rampant, unchecked growth in our community. Now, the future really is in the hands of the citizens. If citizens don’t want to see a repeat of the past, then they need to get involved.
Tuesday was a good beginning.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Jamie has new column; Ortiz goes blog wild...
Jamie Gonzales has a new Jamie's Journal entry which will be in Friday's Citizen and Reporter Gamaliel Ortiz has gone blogwild on his politics blog, City Beat. Check it out.
Interesting Connector meeting last night...
The city of Elk Grove and community activists joined together Tuesday night and held an important update/public information meeting about the connector highway which will likely link El Dorado County to I-5 near Hood/Franklin. Three of the four alternatives currently being examined involve going down Grantline Road and through the rural community of Sheldon.
The meeting was well attended, as four Elk Grove City Council members and also four members of the Elk Grove Planning Commission were at city hall for the presentation by Tom Zlotkowski, Pat Hume, and Don Nottoli. Numerous candidates for city council as well as the Cosumnes Community Services District were in attendance, as was a good number of Sheldon and Wilton residents. Keri Wood was there taking photos and we'll have a good story for Friday's Citizen.
JF
The meeting was well attended, as four Elk Grove City Council members and also four members of the Elk Grove Planning Commission were at city hall for the presentation by Tom Zlotkowski, Pat Hume, and Don Nottoli. Numerous candidates for city council as well as the Cosumnes Community Services District were in attendance, as was a good number of Sheldon and Wilton residents. Keri Wood was there taking photos and we'll have a good story for Friday's Citizen.
JF
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)